From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18385551e0d37b37
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-31 09:31:55 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!witch!mlb!mbayern
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <628@mlb.win.net>
References: <44279.cwarwick@fox.nstn.ns.ca><38pbmi$4n9@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
Reply-To: mbayern@mlb.win.net (Mark Bayern)
From: mbayern@mlb.win.net (Mark Bayern)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 1994 15:08:29 GMT
Subject: Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
Date: 1994-10-31T15:08:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

 
In article <38pbmi$4n9@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>, Robert Dewar (dewar@cs.nyu.edu) writes:


>
>You burned yourself on this one by making a totally unwarranted assumption!
>

Yes, but lets be clear what burned him.  Not Alsys Ada, but making
assumptions about MS-DOS's capabilities!

Mark