From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a88e582de42cdc9b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!81.171.88.10.MISMATCH!ramfeed1.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!213.239.142.2.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <amosteo@unizar.es>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:08:44 +0100
Message-ID: <624tcvF21i3nvU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <0_mdna0iHpIsCifaRVnzvQA@telenor.com>
 <47ba9867$0$21892$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> <dN2dndl3zoW5Oifa4p2dnAA@telenor.com>
 <dbe54d78-5bd2-4ad0-ab93-f00b099ae5a3@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com>
 <spCdnTyCKpCfvSHaRVnzvQA@telenor.com>
 <3a281192-2744-4110-9fc1-90c155c9436b@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <qm_uj.42460$yE1.36921@attbi_s21>
 <48277611-402f-4622-be05-6edddf6dd56a@o10g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <fpigq5$5me$1@jacob-sparre.dk> <gcejpf.ir2.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
Reply-To: alejandro@mosteo.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Xe5zUDiA4IAS7MMtNoa77gqk0qpZByEQPZRpPAuWJnF4grDhg=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ETZ5YOaVizulvGM1Y5fR7ykDewg=
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
In-Reply-To: <gcejpf.ir2.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19942
Date: 2008-02-21T10:08:44+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
> Randy Brukardt a écrit :
>> The other obvious evidence that this is a bad thing is that OP's
>> question:
>> which we see here several times a year. It would obviously be better
>> if we
>> didn't have to deal with that (and remember that many people will not
>> actually write such a question, so there probably are many more that are
>> confused).
>>
> Hmm... maybe we coud suggest to AdaCore (anybody listening?) that the
> GPL version should have the checks on by default, and let the default be
> what paying customers demand for the Pro version. After all, GnatGPL is
> 2005 by default, and Pro is 95 by default, so it should be doable.

Seems sensible to me. I guess very few of us aware of this issue compile
during development without -gnato