From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd7c9,4c42ac518eba0bbe
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd7c9,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c42ac518eba0bbe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: aph@cygnus.remove.co.uk (Andrew Haley)
Subject: Re: Programming language vote - results
Date: 1997/10/16
Message-ID: <624mm9$9i4$2@korai.cygnus.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 281270025
References: <343fbb5a.0@news.iprolink.ch> <343FD05C.8986A557@flash.net>
 <3441B496.41C6@lmco.com> <3442B745.5352@lmco.com>
 <01bcd9ce$270ec120$3ba7410c@default>
Organization: Cygnus Solutions, Cambridge, UK
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


William Dale Jr <William.Dale.Jr@lmco.com> wrote in article
<3442B745.5352@lmco.com>...
[...]
> Ignorance of the domain and the forced use of obscure (MIL-STD-1750A)
> processors have also given Ada a bad name.

I did a Forth for MIL-STD-1750A: it's a nice architecture, and was a
pleasure to program.  I don't see how it's possible to blame that
processor for any problems with Ada.

Andrew.