From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d676a4bf883e6826 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.zanker.org!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.news-service.com!post.news-service.com!news1.surfino.com!not-for-mail Message-Id: <6240403.AlpodYFlPf@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: task synchronization and activation Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Reply-To: martin@krischik.com Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:47:03 +0100 References: <5f59677c.0502190711.1d6d2492@posting.google.com> <18824603.NgNnWmvhLG@linux1.krischik.com> Organization: None User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@surfino.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.169.148.166 (83.169.148.166) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:00:11 +0100 X-Trace: 0875d42186dbbf60c310305150 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8429 Date: 2005-02-20T11:47:03+01:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > Martin Krischik writes: > One possibility is that the original designers were thinking about the > fact that exceptions that occur before the "begin" can't be handled. > But I don't see why that makes any real difference. AFAIK an exception happen before begin go back to the originator task. I at least had lot's of fun with exeptions raised in one task and caught in another. Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com