From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-01 12:57:24 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: gmc444@yahoo.com (Greg C)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ?
Date: 1 Apr 2002 12:57:24 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <62340e2a.0204011257.4679edb4@posting.google.com>
References: <gvSo8.10$X76.855@paloalto-snr2.gtei.net>
 <3CA48637.C5C4DEF5@despammed.com> <3ca487fd$1@news.cadence.com>
 <u3cyjfbn9.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.209.183.148
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1017694644 11755 127.0.0.1 (1 Apr 2002 20:57:24
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Apr 2002 20:57:24 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21957
Date: 2002-04-01T20:57:24+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:<u3cyjfbn9.fsf@wanadoo.fr>...
> Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> writes:
> 
> > Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com> writes:
> > 
> > > Ada on .Net would be a Good Thing, but if it
> > > would remain truly Ada, it would be a Better Thing.
> > 
> > I seem to remember that Eiffel changed its definition to better fit
> > the model of .NET.
> 
> Well they do not have changed Eiffel definition, but they have created an
> Eiffel .NET language. For example on .NET there is no multiple inheritance...

Not true. The Beta version had some restrictions, but no MI was not
one of them. There are limitations on using MI when integrating Eiffel
components with other languages, but that's really because of
limitations in the other languages.

Greg