From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,73cb216d191f0fef
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.81.101 with SMTP id z5mr1700970wix.7.1363918479209;
        Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p18ni6019wiv.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.83.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this expected behavior or not
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:47:24 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <618g40fo2vcv.1kxs7axz30dsp$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <ki034o$6g6$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <hiybjkhz3p5d.1x6dxfr1ptgcg.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1320854478385114328.944480rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
 <67810vo62ikk$.sn112ruycoaw.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5144597d$0$6642$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4dmdbmzm1ti0$.17x4ya0k57x2x.dlg@40tude.net>
 <51449969$0$6637$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: XRUMb5xlbonTNodERpEXEw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2013-03-16T18:47:24+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:10:17 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 16.03.13 14:04, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

>> Why don't you simply explain why in your opinion Positive is not a type?
> 
> Whether or not Positive'Succ *is* invariant depends solely on definitions
> of Ada, not on my opinion.

You don't answer the question.

How Ada defines S'Succ is pretty clear. In question is why so and could it
be different. I already listed all variants. There are 4 of them + 1 when
the operation gets disallowed.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de