From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:2123 comp.software-eng:1230 news.groups:7767
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!rjh
From: rjh@cs.purdue.EDU (Bob Hathaway)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng,news.groups
Subject: Re: Apology for ``Bill Wolfe''
Message-ID: <6173@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Date: 5 Mar 89 01:22:08 GMT
References: <4655@hubcap.UUCP>
Sender: news@cs.purdue.EDU
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4655@hubcap.UUCP>, 629mtc@hubcap.clemson.edu (Clemson AI Lab,3444,3444,0000) writes:
>If WOLFE should somehow regain USENET access, please
>do not reply to its postings.  That only makes it waste more
>CPU cycles and network bandwidth; it seems unable to terminate
>any discussion.

Regardless of your opinions on Bill Wolfe, your posting (and a previous
one to the same effect) are the worst show of lack of professionalism 
and network ethics on USENET I can recall.  If I were spaf I'd find out 
who you are and throw you off USENET.  Keep personal conflicts personal.
By the way, I know spaf and I'm forwarding a copy of this to him as well.