From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:2071 comp.software-eng:1164
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!rjh
From: rjh@cs.purdue.EDU (Bob Hathaway)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: "Forced to Use Ada"
Keywords: Ada, mandate
Message-ID: <6125@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 89 23:28:05 GMT
References: <470@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
Sender: news@cs.purdue.EDU
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <470@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>, eberard@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Edward Berard) writes:
>of these posters would be surprised to know that a majority of Ada
>users worldwide use Ada because they want to, not because of any
>mandate. For example, in Europe much more than 50% of the money spent
>on Ada software is spent by those who have no mandate to use Ada,
>i.e., they are free to use any technology they wish.
>

I decided Ada was the best language after independently studying
programming for some time in school.  I had to use C and Pascal in
coursework and after some asking, Modula-2.  So, I was mandated to use
alternative languages although I strongly desired and asked to program
in Ada.  I'm glad to see someone (the government) advocating modern
programming languages along with software engineering; the more support
the better.

Bob Hathaway
rjh@purdue.edu