From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,369ed27a1a2dd2cb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Joel VanLaven <jvl@ocsystems.com>
Subject: Re: QUIZ: To be or not to be (able to post)
Date: 1997/10/02
Message-ID: <6114h5$pmk@news3.his.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 277418890
Sender: Joel VanLaven <jvl@fred.ocsystems.com>
References: <610a7h$a7n@news3.his.com> <EHG0r1.K47.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Organization: OC Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Tucker Taft <stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com> wrote:

: Actually, they *are* subtype conformant, but they are not *fully* conformant
: because of the formal parameter name change from F to X.  I bet your
: compiler knew that already ;-).

Sure enough, I goofed.  I tried compiling it with the X changed to an F and
it worked so our compiler must have "known that".  I am just a little
surprised that the "obvious" big difference (between float and float'base) 
wasn't really a difference at all.

Thanks for the catch.

-- Joel VanLaven