From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,145c4a0f1a1fc553,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Resonable to assume format Stream_IO = Direct_IO?
Date: 1997/09/30
Message-ID: <60q06u$7jc$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 276606296
Distribution: world
X-XXMessage-ID: <B056C1BB2D021035@sambar.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Organization: RMIT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


If a direct_io file is created, would it be resonable to expect that
most implementations would allow you to read it back using Stream_IO.

I know that Dec's Ada83 compiler put  all sorts of extra things into
a direct_io file; is this implementation freedom still taken advantage
of by Ada95 vendors?


Dale