From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,99a6311c4195e21b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mario@klebsch.de (Mario Klebsch)
Subject: Re: Matrix Multiplication
Date: 1999/12/15
Message-ID: <60l838.ocd.ln@ds9.klebsch.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 561266361
References: <9BBB0C9AF506D311A68E00902745A537C236B1@fsxqpz04.usafa.af.mil>
Organization: IRD InterNet Services GmbH
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Carlisle, Martin" <Martin.Carlisle@usafa.af.mil> writes:

>The idea that matrix multiplication would always be inlined seems absurd to
>me.  The simple implementation has O(n^3) running time.

What about compiling for a CPU, that does have an instruction for
matrix multiplication? It seems absurd to me, not to use that
instruction, if it is available.

73, Mario
-- 
Mario Klebsch						mario@klebsch.de