From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,896d86ef3723978c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ok@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) Subject: Re: maintenance of overriding subprograms Date: 1997/09/26 Message-ID: <60f651$m3e$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 275599643 References: <340C2EA5.B9F@gsfc.nasa.gov> <340DCE1D.6C5F@bix.com> <5v3dlu$pgu$1@miso.it.uq.edu.au> <5v87gd$r00$1@miso.it.uq.edu.au> <5vau2k$psf$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <3421C9D7.582B@gsg.eds.com> <34295DB2.4186@ac3i.dseg.ti.com> <342AA19F.71F4@gsg.eds.com> Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. NNTP-Posting-User: ok Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: > This thread is based on initialise/initialize. > I have real trouble with colour/color (I mean, English is French based, > not Spanish based, right? (:-) (:-)). Did no-one notice the smileys? I am well aware of the history of English (including the substantial influence of the native Celtic languages). The point at issue here is the *writing* system, and it does actually happen to be true that the English writing system is based on Norman French scribal practices. (The change from _written_ Anglo-Saxon to _written_ Middle English is bigger than the change in the _spoken_ language.) Concerning the OED and "ize/ise", I think it is worth pointing out that the ize/ise variation extends into things the OED thinks it shouldn't. In the last week, I have read two books where "surprise" was consistently spelled "surprize". Given the fact that there are two current writing systems for English, not completely compatible, international standards would be well advised to either _avoid_ words commonly spelled differently in these systems, or to bless both versions. For example, if plans to develop an international standard for Erlang come to fruition, I will press for the existing -behaviour(Name). declaration to be supplemented with a -behavior(Name). declaration with identical meaning, despite the fact that the former is my preferred spelling. -- Unsolicited commercial E-mail to this account is prohibited; see section 76E of the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 as amended by the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act No 108 of 1989. Maximum penalty: 10 years in gaol. Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/%7Eok; RMIT Comp.Sci.