From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ssc-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!david
From: david@ssc-vax.UUCP (David Norris)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: CP/M Ada implementations
Message-ID: <606@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-Nov-83 14:12:44 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.606
Posted: Mon Nov  7 14:12:44 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Nov-83 04:35:05 EST
Organization: Boeing Aerospace, Seattle
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I am interested in any and all comments on Ada implementations for CP/M
machines, of which (to my knowledge) there are three:

	SuperSoft (Maranatha) Ada
	R&R Janus
	Augusta

I am specifically interested in comments that compare and contrast these
compilers, including:

	tools (or lack thereof)
	compiler/code size/speed
	what you like or don't like about an implementation
	specific reasons you would pick one implementation over another
	documentation

Any other personal observations would be welcomed;  feelings about tutorials
in documentation (how much?), product support, etc. I can post the results
if there is sufficient interest; however, I'm afraid the results would be
somewhat biased.  Thanks.
   -- Dave Norris (...!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!david)