From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8f8cea8602e61aba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ok@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Subject: Re: The Red Language
Date: 1997/09/22
Message-ID: <604vlg$2j8$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 274416309
References: <340E2DC5.25D7@worldnet.att.net>
 <Pine.SGI.3.95.970916190053.19184D-100000@shellx.best.com>
 <EGoLLn.ABt@world.std.com> <dewar.874664808@merv> <EGrv5y.C2D@world.std.com>
 <dewar.874850594@merv>
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
NNTP-Posting-User: ok
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

>Algol-68 overloading is strictly based on operand types. There are two
>sources for looking at A68. First there was an article in Computing
>Surveys (one of its early issues), I *think* the title was something
>like "Algol-68 without Tears", but I could be imagining.

The Computer Journal.
"Algol 68 with fewer tears."

Wasn't the RR published as an issue of Numerische Mathematik?
-- 
Unsolicited commercial E-mail to this account is prohibited; see section 76E
of the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 as amended by the Crimes Legislation
Amendment Act No 108 of 1989.  Maximum penalty:  10 years in gaol.
Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/%7Eok; RMIT Comp.Sci.