From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,86adf9f3441b35ad X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Adam Beneschan Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: requeue vs requeue with abort - code example pleaseeee Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:30:15 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <604b2e52-cfcb-49d0-9ecf-cf9f9135a57c@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com> References: <7bd3db89-ae9d-4e09-9590-676f85dcef9a@w2g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <1hvnr1d2wp3vj$.fnxma3y5cxig.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1292016616 10053 127.0.0.1 (10 Dec 2010 21:30:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15892 Date: 2010-12-10T13:30:15-08:00 List-Id: On Dec 10, 12:13=A0pm, Warren wrote: > Dmitry A. Kazakov expounded innews:1hvnr1d2wp3vj$.fnxma3y5cxig.dlg@40tude= .net: > > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:00:12 +0000 (UTC), Warren wrote: > > >> Also remember it is "Ada" not "ADA". Otherwise we might > >> assume you're learning dentistry. ;-) > > > All elder languages had capitalized names: FORTRAN, COBOL, > > PL, SNOBOL, C. .. > > That was once true of acronyms, but not for names. As a name, it > has never been right to fully capitalize Ada. > > Why they changed the rule for acronyms, beats me though. I liked > things they way they were. Did capitals get more expensive? I'm curious---what acronyms are you referring to? Most acronyms I see are still in upper case. (A few pronounceable acronyms ended up becoming actual words, such as "radar", but that's an exceptional case.) But I don't think there's been a rule change... -- Adam