From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c13cc000274246b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dale Stanbrough Subject: Re: Please Help. Date: 1997/09/15 Message-ID: <5vkcji$im0$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 272830965 Distribution: world References: <01bcbcde$f8a425c0$ca70fe8c@default> <5viibu$cbs$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <341D4041.4AF8@gsfc.nasa.gov> X-XXMessage-ID: Organization: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: "As I thought. So Dale (if you're still reading :), will you be pointing out that using Unbounded_String does have a big downside? When you get to teaching about dynamic memory allocation and managment, you could point out that they've been doing it all along without thinking about it, just like a lot of professional programmers!." Stephen, you are presuming that i haven't already talked about it. Yes this is an interesting thing to talk about, i may devote a bit more time to it (should i introduce the concept of finalization, which is yet another programming gizmo?) Dale