From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e28ffe0eaf31d1b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ok@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ Date: 1997/09/08 Message-ID: <5v0lba$jnv$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270674861 References: <34090462.4652@easystreet.com> <340C47F8.670B@osc.edu> Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. NNTP-Posting-User: ok Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "James B. White, III (Trey)" writes: >Ada may have advantages over C++, but only C++ allows these incredibly >powerful programming techniques. False. Lisp people know this kind of meta-programming as a very old technique indeed. -- Unsolicited commercial E-mail to this account is prohibited; see section 76E of the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 as amended by the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act No 108 of 1989. Maximum penalty: 10 years in gaol. Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/%7Eok; RMIT Comp.Sci.