From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: chaos@idiom.com (Hwa-Jin Bae) Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/09/02 Message-ID: <5uhjr4$i2o@idiom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 269841471 References: <5ph4g5$sbs$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <5uhe6s$g8q@taurus.ftl.telematics.com> Organization: The DeRome Mansion Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-09-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: ted@telematics.com (Ted Goldblatt) writes: > We use Tornado, >(with no special source license) and _we_ have the source to all of >the modified GNU tools (it was included on the release CDROM). This is contrary to my experience, and contents of CD-ROMs that I have access to. However, the ones I have are perhaps one of the earlier copies sold. I no reason to disbelieve you, and you sound like you know for sure. Therefore, I would like to apologize to all that I have unjustly accused of wrongdoings. I make this public apology on the basis that given your experience and mine, you have a different experience with Tornado than me. And I am willing to consider that I might have been wrong biased by circumstances that indicated otherwise. I am very glad that the GNU tools are accompanied with source code.