From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,86f72a7c465f6eb3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody
From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: seperate compilation for protected objects
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:44:37 +0200
Organization: Adalog
Message-ID: <5sug2d.qmp.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
References: <1112270905.678889.118410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1112277788 18418 195.25.228.57 (31 Mar 2005
 14:03:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:03:08 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
In-Reply-To: <1112270905.678889.118410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10189
Date: 2005-03-31T15:44:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Andrew a �crit :
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to do seperate compilation with a protected object.
> 
> I have something similar to the following:
> 
> === file tasks.ads ===
> package Tasks is
> 
>     protected type Boob is
>         . . .
>     end Boob;
> end Tasks;
> 
> === file tasks.adb ===
> package body Tasks is
>     <blah>
>     protected body Boob is seperate;
> end Tasks;
> 
> I am using Gnat3.15p on FreeBSD Unix.
> I get similar compilation messages to the below:
> tasks.adb:<#>:<#>: all components must be declared in spec
> ...
> 
A wild guess, since you didn't show the body:
Didn't you declare components in the body? i.e.

protected body Boob is
     X : integer; -- Not allowed
     ....
end Boob;

Remember that a protected object is actually more like a record than a 
package; it has no variables, only components (like record components), 
and they are not allowed in the body.

Presumably, this has nothing to do with separate compilation...

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
            J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr