From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86616b1931cbdae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: herwin@osf1.gmu.edu (HARRY R. ERWIN) Subject: Re: Is Ada likely to survive ? Date: 1997/08/06 Message-ID: <5sag85$9n2@portal.gmu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262636070 References: <97080410223317@psavax.pwfl.com> Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar (dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu) wrote: : Marin says : <> : The extraordinary thing is that this myth is actually believed by : some experienced managers as well as programmers who simply don't know. Until a week ago, I believed it, too, and then Dewar pointed me in the right direction. I trotted over like a good little horse, confirmed he knew what he was talking about, and started passing the word in my little corner of the world. : ---trimmed--- : It is not uncommon for people in limited environments to have extraordinarily : curious ideas of what is going on. I often meet people in academic : environments who think Unix is a widely used system (an interesting : statistic here is that OS/2, which everyone knows is a failure, has : sold more copies than all versions of Unix in all of time). 'POSIX compliance' (read 'sorta like UNIX') is the operating system version of the Ada mandate. Interestingly, Windows NT is 'POSIX compliant' to ensure that it can be bid on Govt contracts that require it, and (IMHO) is nearly useless when it is used that way. (Is my cynicism showing?) Cheers-- Harry Erwin, Internet: herwin@gmu.edu, Web Page: http://osf1.gmu.edu/~herwin PhD student in computational neuroscience (how bats echolocate) Lecturer for CS 211 (data structures and advanced C++) Senior Software Analyst supporting the FAA