From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b43af03023b41f76 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: JEWL on XP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <5sMRk.427973$yE1.118321@attbi_s21> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s21 1226281857 12.201.97.213 (Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:50:57 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:50:57 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:50:57 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2624 Date: 2008-11-10T01:50:57+00:00 List-Id: Mike H wrote: > > From a quick scan of the documentation, JEWL would appear to provide > all I need. However certain parts of that same documentation lead to the > question, will JEWL run on XP? And if not, is there anything else that > might serve? JEWL runs fine on XP. Depending on your compiler, you may need to convert the single "pragma Linker_Options" into multiple, one for each item in the single one. -- Jeff Carter "My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives." Blazing Saddles 89