From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca4868d2201d6f5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: brashear@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Philip Brashear)
Subject: Re: demise of ajpo?
Date: 1997/07/31
Message-ID: <5rpsf7$e8b@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 260919282
References: <33CE894F.41C6@hso.link.com> <dewar.869953226@merv>
 <5ri2d9$kbo@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us> <dewar.870192058@merv>
Organization: None
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-31T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.870192058@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>Phil said
>
>You surely mean 2.0.1 and not 2.1 in the above, right?
>

UH-OH!  One of the pitfalls of correcting someone else (my correcting Robert)
is the likelihood of making a mistake in the correction.

Yes, I meant 2.0.1.  Since there haven't been any 2.1 validations yet, it's
a good thing that the last date for its use hasn't come yet!

Sorry.

Phil