From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c7d0d9bb51281ec
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mbates@ionet.net (Mike D Bates)
Subject: Re: Ada95 Tools & OOD
Date: 1997/07/30
Message-ID: <5rp2eh$1mi@ion1.ionet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 260819192
References: <01bc96fb$957287c0$af7e02d0@kevinb>
 <5r6cca$jif$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>
Organization: Internet Oklahoma
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5r6cca$jif$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>,
Robert B. Love  <rlove@antispam.neosoft.com> wrote:
>In <01bc96fb$957287c0$af7e02d0@kevinb> "Kevin Bonifield" wrote:
>> Can anyone give a recommendation for Ada95-related development
>> tools and training?  In particular we need to get about 5-7 people
>> up to speed on Ada and OOA/OOD in the near future.  Not many
>> tech-course offerings here in Tulsa, OK, I'm afraid.

>Dang!  I don't know if I should be happy or not.  Its just been 3-4
>weeks ago when people at this company said they wouldn't be using Ada
>anymore.  All of us in the flight simulation biz cheered and laughed
>at how we'd have a competitive edge.  So I get more people using
>Ada, which is a good thing but I get my competition getting smarter.

Not to worry, it's only for a military job.  














-- 
Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, Section 227, any and
all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a
download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US.  E-mailing denotes
acceptance of these terms.