From: "Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: reading a text file into a string
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:56:20 -0400
Date: 2004-07-23T22:56:20-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5rmdnbYCbs1JUpzc4p2dnA@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rOWdnYp1K5bk_Z3cRVn-vA@megapath.net>
Randy Brukardt wrote:
> Indeed, it would make the most sense to allocate such objects from a storage
> pool (with enough extra memory to support the alignment); align the
> resulting address, and use an address clause to force the object to use that
> memory. That would get the performance benefit in the rare case where it
> would help without costing anything to implementors or to users of programs
> that don't need the alignment.
You may have a winner Randy. The problem (to me) is that the pain of
aligning buffers 'by hand' is high enough that I only do it when it is
necessary to get decent performance. I am talking of cases where there
is a 2x or 3x speedup if some objects are cache aligned. For ordinary
programs where there may be a 5 to 10% benefit for aligning a particular
buffer, it is just too much work without compiler support.
But if I create a cache-aligned storage pool, where all objects are
allocated on natural cache boundaries then I just need a couple extra
lines to do the alignment. Of course the buffers will have to be on the
heap, I'm thinking about the right garbage collection approach to use...
--
Robert I. Eachus
"The flames kindled on the Fourth of July, 1776, have spread over too
much of the globe to be extinguished by the feeble engines of despotism;
on the contrary, they will consume these engines and all who work them."
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1821
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-24 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 17:27 reading a text file into a string zork
2004-07-15 17:49 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-07-15 19:57 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-15 17:59 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-07-15 19:18 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-15 19:18 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-15 20:02 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-16 1:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-07-16 2:20 ` Steve
2004-07-16 2:26 ` Steve
2004-07-16 16:16 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-07-16 17:45 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-16 21:19 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-17 2:27 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-07-17 11:31 ` Mats Weber
2004-07-17 15:52 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-07-17 22:38 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-07-18 13:44 ` zork
2004-07-19 8:07 ` Dale Stanbrough
2004-07-19 8:58 ` Martin Dowie
2004-07-21 0:17 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-07-21 21:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-22 22:34 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-07-23 0:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-23 21:56 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-24 0:34 ` tmoran
2004-07-24 1:16 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-24 1:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-24 15:14 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-26 23:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-27 12:08 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-27 23:24 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-07-29 0:55 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-29 0:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-29 7:25 ` Martin Dowie
2004-07-29 20:08 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-07-30 0:14 ` tmoran
2004-07-24 2:56 ` Robert I. Eachus [this message]
2004-07-19 11:51 ` Ada2005 (was " Peter Hermann
2004-07-19 12:51 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-07-19 13:01 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-19 13:35 ` Martin Dowie
2004-07-19 17:22 ` Nick Roberts
2004-07-19 23:50 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox