From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca4868d2201d6f5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: brashear@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Philip Brashear)
Subject: Re: demise of ajpo?
Date: 1997/07/28
Message-ID: <5ri2d9$kbo@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 259746342
References: <33CE894F.41C6@hso.link.com> <dewar.869953226@merv>
Organization: None
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.869953226@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>We assume that the delay is just because there were a lot of validations
>at the last minute (June 30 was the last day for ACVC 2.0.1 validations,
>and we know of a lot of validations in those last cople weeks). 
>


Minor correction, and a little secondhand information:  The last day to START
an ACVC 2.1 validation was July 5, 1997.  Any validation effort that began
on-site testing by that date was permitted to complete.  Several validations
fell into those categories, and their certificate requests were not submitted
to the AJPO/AdaIC until later.  Since the AdaIC received NO certificate 
requests during June, the decision was made to delay the July update to the
VCL until those requests were complete.  It should appear any day now.

The AdaIC is operated by IITRI under contract to the AJPO.  AJPO funding has
not yet dried up.  I wish I knew more than that.

Phil Brashear