From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86616b1931cbdae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Nasser Subject: Re: Is Ada likely to survive ? Date: 1997/07/22 Message-ID: <5r4346$4q6@drn.zippo.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 258398682 References: <33D005F2.E5DCD710@kaiwan.com> <5qp3cf$aqc$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <5r3v57$3nb$1@krusty.irvine.com> Organization: None Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5r3v57$3nb$1@krusty.irvine.com>, adam@irvine.com says... >IMHO, this answers the original poster's question well. If PL/I has >survived for 30 years, despite the fact that many of us rarely meet >anyone who actually uses it, then surely Ada will survive at least >that long. > >1/2 :-) > -- Adam When I worded at EDS, I used PLI allot, at the time, most of the software we written for the GM account was in PLI, I thought it was a really neat and powerfull language, and I liked programming in it, the problem is that it does not have modern stuff in it like user defined data types for a starter, at least in the DEC subset that we used. any way, back to the main topic at hand.. Nasser