From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e4bb63e08046e1a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-24 18:49:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc53.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "SteveD" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: is exception when others => null; smart? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <5r1u9.65875$Hj7.32500@rwcrnsc53> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.211.13.75 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc53 1035510593 12.211.13.75 (Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:49:53 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:49:53 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:49:53 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30118 Date: 2002-10-25T01:49:53+00:00 List-Id: "Preben Randhol" wrote in message news:slrnarfvcc.4ud.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no... [snip] > > My question is: Is this smart? I mean won't you then automatically mask > all the potential problems you might get at run-time so that you won't > see errors in the code during testing? I can see that it might also have > advantages, but before I implement this I would like to hear what you > think. > Although I don't use Emacs or Vi, I would vote to not automatically inserting exception handlers that ignores exceptions. Although it might make Ada appear more familiar to C programmers ;-) SteveD > Thanks in advance. > > Preben > -- > Ada95 makes your code less cryptic.