From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aea4cc77526f5e4a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!4988f22a!not-for-mail
From: <adaworks@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <FJDvj.10151$0o7.9092@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>
 <47bf11df$0$14990$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
 <CzJvj.7422$Ru4.6768@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>
 <47bfc5d4$0$21890$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
 <47bfc7b5$0$21890$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
Subject: Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Message-ID: <5qXvj.2579$fX7.2237@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.134.114.51
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com 1203782401 ST000 70.134.114.51 (Sat,
 23 Feb 2008 11:00:01 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:00:01 EST
Organization: AT&T http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: 
 Q[R_@SBEQJV]SQ@[EZOD]_\@VR]^@B@MCPWZKB]MPXHZUYICD^RAQBKZQTZTX\_I[^G_KGFNON[ZOE_AZNVO^\XGGNTCIRPIJH[@RQKBXLRZ@CD^HKANYVW@RLGEZEJN@\_WZJBNZYYKVIOR]T]MNMG_Z[YVWSCH_Q[GPC_A@CARQVXDSDA^M]@DRVUM@RBM
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:00:33 -0800
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20027
Date: 2008-02-23T08:00:33-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Niklas Holsti" <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> wrote in message 
news:47bfc7b5$0$21890$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi...
> Replying to my own post in order to add a remark:
>  What I often do instead is to divide the original package, which contains 
> parts with very different dependencies, into a parent and one or more 
> children, according to some logical criterion from the clients' point of view. 
> I find that this often also sorts out the dependencies in the bodies, reducing 
> the advantage of splitting the bodies into "is separate" parts.
>
This is an excellent solution.   However, I still prefer to design so my
dependencies are, as often as possible, at the package body or
separate subprogram level as possible.