From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/07/09 Message-ID: <5q13dn$9t2$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 255832726 References: <5pthps$v0b$1@news.nyu.edu> Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-07-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article David Kastrup writes: >With all due respect, please look at the bug report data base. More >than half of the bugs I reported since gcc 2.5.something are still >pending correction. It might well be that they have been fixed for >years now, but the last major release of gcc (2.7.0) was made more >than two years ago. No, under two years ago, but there presently is a major gap. But I'm not sure I see what your comment above has to do with your original claim, which was that many bugs are reported by different people. >Note that this applies largely to the g++ frontend which has been >under the heaviest changes in the last few years. The backend, >fortunately, is somewhat more stable. But that's what I was talking about.