From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,3d3f20d31be1c33a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: Is ADA as good for graphics programming as C?  (WAS: Re: Avoiding
 the second historic mistake)
Date: 1997/07/08
Message-ID: <5pu1hn$5g5$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255568939
References: <mheaney-ya023680000407970016150001@news.ni.net>
 <slrn5rq1gc.che.abo@minkirri. <slrn5s1132.hf1.abo@minkirri.apana.org.au>
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Newsgroups: 
 comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1997-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <slrn5s1132.hf1.abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> abo@minkirri.apana.org.au (Donovan Baarda) writes:
>As a matter of interest, were the extensions added to the gcc backend for
>Ada and Fortran merged and added to the gcc back end in general, or are
>they mantained seperately as language specific backends?

The changes to GCC for Ada were quite small and were put into the general
GCC distribution quite a long time ago.

There have not been any changes (aside from bug fixes) required for
Fortran.  There are some bouncing around, but they haven't yet reached
the level of being officially suggested for inclusion in GCC.