From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b4ea5eaae214b80
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: Ada 95 for S/390
Date: 1997/07/08
Message-ID: <5pthle$vgh$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255516354
References: <5pikv1$4t5$1@ratatosk.uio.no> <dewar.868022058@merv>
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.868022058@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>As far as I know, no one is doing work towards an Ada 95 compiler on the
>IBM mainframe. Proabbly the easiest path would be a GNAT port, since there
>is a GCC for this system.

Though GNAT indeed is probably the easiest path, this would involve
considerable work since that GCC port is in very bad shape and is not
even close to the point of being able to bootstrap GCC, let alone GNAT.