From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,124bb421754468c6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: voelter@acm.org (Markus Voelter)
Subject: Is GNAT as good as commercial Ada compilers?
Date: 1997/07/05
Message-ID: <5pl34g$eau$1@news.belwue.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 254744613
Organization: InterNetNews at News.BelWue.DE (Stuttgart, Germany)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Hello all,

in the near future I will have to work a lot with GNAT on linux. I wonder 
if GNAT is comparable to comercial compilers.

Does it have a source-level debugger ? Are there any features it does not 
implement ( Tasking, Garbage collection ), or is it more "buggy" than 
commercial ones? WHat about its documentation?

Any comments welcome!

regards Markus

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Markus Voelter               http://next1.rz.fh-weingarten.de/~voelter
voelter@acm.org                      phone/fax: (Germany) 0751 / 46928
----------------------------------------------------------------------