From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: dweller@news.imagin.net (David Weller) Subject: Re: GLADE and GPL (was: what DOES the GPL really say?) Date: 1997/07/02 Message-ID: <5pdi3t$378h$1@prime.imagin.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254053003 References: <5ousck$6rj@kiwi.ics.uci.edu> <5p0eum$1293$1@prime.imagin.net> Organization: ImagiNet Communications Ltd, Arlington, Texas Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-07-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert Dewar scolds Dave Weller: >If indeed you are now saying "sorry, this is not my opinion, but it is >what other people seem to think", then that's another matter, but in that >case your original post was, to say the least, confusing and misleading! > Good point. Your analysis is correct, mostly :-) >By all means argue objectively in favor of one licensing scheme or another, >but please let's not spread rumour and inaccurate inuendo here! > >From my own perspective, I don't care which licensing scheme somebody chooses, as long as _anybody_ using _any_ of the licensing schemes we're talking about takes the time to truly understand them. -- Booch Components Homepage: www.rivatech.com ||Ada Homepage: www.adahome.com