From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f65d0,bd4d2fccdf730b16 X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: gnat-3.10 Date: 1997/07/01 Message-ID: <5pbcfd$8qd$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 253903966 References: Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.gcc Date: 1997-07-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article Corey Minyard writes: >What they do not seem to do, which disturbs me a little, is distribute >the GCC base they use to build their stuff on their FTP site. Since >the patches they supply don't apply perfectly, they are obviously >using a patched GCC base and do not provide information about how to >get it. No, the patch file applies to an unmodified GCC 2.7.2. It is applied to that base every night automatically. Yes, some of the patches were originally derived from different GCC version of GCC sources, so the line numbers aren't exact, but those exact patches are applied to the 2.7.2 sources each night to do builds.