From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: GLADE and GPL (was: what DOES the GPL really say?)
Date: 1997/07/01
Message-ID: <5p9pte$2a5$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 253765243
References: <5p0eum$1293$1@prime.imagin.net> <5p1s2l$2a2$1@news.nyu.edu>
 <dewar.867464659@merv>
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss
Date: 1997-07-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.867464659@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>the wording is NOT copied from the run-time
>functions used in GCC, because it spefcifically handles generics.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that it was identical, just that the
general idea of such an exception is quite old.