From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c70f02b79bc3d231
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: wheeler@ida.org (David Wheeler)
Subject: Re: dynamic memory allocation
Date: 1997/06/20
Message-ID: <5oe1e3$onh@news.ida.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 251338628
References: <33A55F1B.63FE@gsfc.nasa.gov> <5o7jql$jpo@news.ida.org>
 <33A7E665.10A@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Organization: IDA, Alexandria, Virginia
Reply-To: dwheeler@ida.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Stephen Leake (Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov) wrote:

Another good reference regarding the limitations of reliability measures
(with hints about the general limitations of testing) is:

"The infeasibility of quantifying the reliability of life-critical
real-time software." Ricky W. Butler and George B. Finelli.
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(1):3-12, January 1993.

--- David A. Wheeler
    dwheeler@ida.org