From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,19b6efa2ecebaed0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) Subject: Re: Ada95 Pretty-Printers Date: 1997/06/11 Message-ID: <5nnrt7$32j7$1@prime.imagin.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 247789775 References: <339C58A6.4D5A@sprintmail.com> <339D677D.2FAC886C@link.com> Organization: ImagiNet Communications Ltd, Arlington, Texas Reply-To: smize@imagin.net (Samuel Mize) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , John G. Volan wrote: >> An Ada mode for emacs could be applied in a batch format, if you >> find one that works reliably for what you want. > >Is there more than one version? Where can I find alternate versions of >emacs Ada mode? I think there's a list of two or three at (surprise!) www.adahome.com. The one we have installed where I work (by an Ada guru who's since left the company) isn't reliable, but it's a darn sight better than none. >Actually, the PRESERVE_WHITESPACE switch will respect the blanks you >manually put into a param list, but here's what Apex does with the >above: I don't know if it's your posting or my news reader, but all your "before" examples appear identical to your "after" examples -- all lined up on the left margin. >...I love Emacs, but I've been using it for years so >I'm used to the interface. Our engineers are only going to go for an >editor that adheres to X and/or Windows standards, and unfortunately >Emacs is not very "desktop friendly." Mine at work is X friendly. Do you mean it all has to be Icons-n-Click driven? Don't they want you to get any real work done? Sam Mize -- Samuel Mize -- smize@imagin.net -- Team Ada (personal net account)