From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f6aa,21f8359ae120b5a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f6aa,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 114917,21f8359ae120b5a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid114917,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.org (Ralph Silverman) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/06/09 Message-ID: <5nh7bd$1vg@nntp.seflin.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 247334142 References: <5md1fl$9f4@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <338A2D0D.5B14@ix.netcom.com> <5meuvm$hpf@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: SEFLIN Free-Net - Broward Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.os.msdos.programmer Date: 1997-06-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Kaz Kylheku (kaz@vision.crest.nt.com) wrote: : In article , Robert Dewar wrote: : >tim says : > : ><technology' : >but the programming metaphor forces the issue...>> : > : > : >Of course it is semantically correct. You can refer to the technology : >of graphology, or the technology of basket weaving, or anything else. : Yes, you can. But by stretching the words too thinly, so to speak, they : lose their ability to discern. : >Technology is a *very* general word in normal English usage. Kaz is : >pushing his own remade lexicon, but do not get confused by it. The trouble : I don't think that the lexicon is remade. And in any case, I'm not going to : resort to the lowly tactic of changing the definitions on the fly. : >with this kind of discussion of the meaning of words is that a lot of : >readers of CLA are not native English speakers. It is not helpful to anyone, : >but especially not helpful to that group, to use English words in a : >non-standard manner! : Such as using technology or engineering to refer to software. : Engineering is the application of *physics* (and derivative hard sciences close : to physics) to create technology. This is seems to be perfectly clear to : everyone except a minority of computer weenies who suffer from engineer envy. I : know real engineers who _laugh_ at the term software engineering. : This definition steps on some people's toes, because they can no longer fancy : themselves to be engineers. The problem is with their complex, not with my : lexicon. : Perhaps their father wanted them to become an engineer and they have : disappointed him by becoming ``mere'' computer programmers. I have known such : cases. the problem of making an automaton which can defeat a ( human ) world chess champion at chess would seem to be an engineering problem ... if achievable ! ( re. recent 'deep blue' events ... ) moreover ... much of 'hard science' and 'engineering' is now a kind of branch of computer science ... due to prevalence of computer aided design and simulation ... moreover ... regarding vehicles ... such as automotive and aviation ... fundamental operability now frequently depends on programming ... certainly at least some programming may, with reason, be viewed as engineering ! -- Ralph Silverman z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us