From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a7f223906eb859a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: gelleric@kafka.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (Wolfgang Gellerich)
Subject: Re: GOTO considered necessary
Date: 1997/06/09
Message-ID: <5ngok1$gdt@zdi.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 247292429
Distribution: world
Sender: gelleric@kafka (Wolfgang Gellerich)
References: <5n977i$2cmc$1@prime.imagin.net>
Organization: Universit�t Stuttgart
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5n977i$2cmc$1@prime.imagin.net>, smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) writes:

|> 
|> I'm rebeating a dead horse, in order to write up a consensus paper to
|> submit to adahome.  I'll appreciate your input.
|> 
|> This one concerns use of "goto" statements.
|> 

Last year, we made a study about today's usage of GOTO statements, comparing
Ada, C, and Fortran and also giving a short summary of the GOTO discussion.
That paper is available in postscript (data about citation etc appended on
the last page). The www address is:

http://www.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/ifi/ps/Gellerich/publications.html


---

  Wolfgang Gellerich