From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, PLING_QUERY,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,925ee3b10e43c3f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: scott@tcville.es.hac.com Subject: Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?! Date: 1997/05/29 Message-ID: <5mkcgj$gi2@hacgate2.hac.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 244776510 Distribution: world References: <5m204l$1b60$1@prime.imagin.net> Organization: Hughes Aircraft Reply-To: scott@tcville.es.hac.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article 1@prime.imagin.net, smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) writes: >In article , >Rick Flower wrote: >> >>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic >>to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor! > >Do they have a big base of existing customers for Ada 83, who would >pay for Ada 83 support? I would expect new customers to want Ada 95. Probably is a function of the project-phase the user-base is in. I know that we'd love to go to Ada95 [and we are using the GH tool suite] but this, for various reasons, isn't possible due to how commited we are to the target-OS, Host-platform, etc.. Scott --- Hughes Aircraft Co./Raytheon/whatever/? voice: (310) 616-1059 Sensors and Communications Systems Segment PO Box 902, EO/E01/A172, El Segundo, Ca. 90245