From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a434e753b9dd044
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: radke@cpre1.ee.iastate.edu (Kevin Radke)
Subject: Re: Time_Span divide question
Date: 1997/05/27
Message-ID: <5mesmk$6r9$1@news.iastate.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 244255780
References: <337C5D12.6230@gsfc.nasa.gov> <dewar.864099351@merv>
 <5ltl4u$ogu$1@news.iastate.edu> <dewar.864583354@merv>
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA  USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.864583354@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>Kevin wrote, responding to me
>
><<>That's definitely wrong. Using the latest version of GNAT on the program,
>>the output is:
>>
>>Duration divide result:  1
>> Int_64 (TS1) =>  495000000
>> Int_64 (TS2) =>  500000000
>>Time_Span divide result:  0
>
>
>Hmmm... 3.07 on NT was definitely broken then since it
>gave 0.
>
>Kevin>>
>
>
>First, there is no 3.07 on NT, perhaps you are talking about 3.09 on NT
>or the 3.07 on DOS (perhaps running on NT?) Anyway, that may well be.
>The correct version above is what I got from GNAT 3.10, which is the
>current version available to customers. We expect a code freeze for
>version 3.10 quite soon, and a public release of 3.10 will occur some
>time in the future.

Alas, Robert is correct (as usual).  It seems I was using 3.09 on
NT (The last public release on NT), and it is the one that returns
the incorrect results.  I look forward for 3.10...

Kevin