From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/26 Message-ID: <5md1fl$9f4@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 244088799 References: <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5mcp5o$ei7$3@news.cc.ucf.edu> Organization: Prism Systems Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5mcp5o$ei7$3@news.cc.ucf.edu>, Fritz W Feuerbacher wrote: >Kaz Kylheku (kaz@vision.crest.nt.com) wrote: > >: Software is not technology; the stuff that it runs on is technology. > >So the concept of Software Engineering Technology is not a technology? I The concept of software engineering is flawed to begin with. Engineering is the application of physics to produce technology. If physics is not involved, you aren't producing technology, nor are you doing engineering. Examples: writing software is not engineering, and the result is not technology, because principles of physics are not required to understand the internal semantics of software systems. Designing a pure logic circuit isn't engineering either, except when you have to solve implementation problems related to heat dissipation, capacitive or inductive coupling and other artifacts related to the _technology_.