From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/23 Message-ID: <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 243471104 References: <01bc66fa$ee7910e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> Organization: Prism Systems Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert I. Eachus wrote: > Another facet of software engineering, and actually demonstrated in >the project above. The synchronization problem is with a new system, >and build 2 needs to provide all the capabilities of the currently >fielded system AND integrate with the new system. Enough complexity >that you don't want any more. But build three has room for all the >customer wants, and new technology. That's another pet peeve of mine: using ``technology'' with reference to software. I've noticed that some hardware manfuacturers have been using the term ``hardware technology'' in their marketing propaganda since it's no longer understood what the word really means. Software is not technology; the stuff that it runs on is technology.