From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/23 Message-ID: <5m4va3$3ji@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 243461918 References: <01bc66fa$ee7910e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <5m3ptf$lfp@ns2.emirates.net.ae> Organization: Prism Systems Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5m3ptf$lfp@ns2.emirates.net.ae>, Mark Allen Framness wrote: >In message <01bc66fa$ee7910e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> - "Nick Roberts" > writes: >:> > > >:>These 'dreamers' may never have been practical or realistic. But they >:>invented the science. >:> >:>If someone says "what if...?", it is fine to say "nice idea, but not >:>today", but at the same we should not get into the habit of 'stepping on' >:>those who suggest ideas. I don't suppose Robert was trying to give this >:>impression at all, but I hope nobody wrongly gets this impression. We need >:>our dreamers. > >Yeah sure this is all true, but we can not lose fact of the sight that science >is much closer to EVOLUTION rather than REVOLUTION, you do say this but I want >to pull out that salient point. Scientific revolutions do happen but they are >far and few in betweeen. Read much Kuhn? :)