From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a434e753b9dd044
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: radke@cpre1.ee.iastate.edu (Kevin Radke)
Subject: Re: Time_Span divide question
Date: 1997/05/21
Message-ID: <5ltl4u$ogu$1@news.iastate.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 242713711
References: <337C5D12.6230@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <EAEnCG.4E1.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <dewar.864099351@merv>
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA  USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.864099351@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>Tuck says
>
><<: Duration divide result:  0
>
>That seems wrong.  Unless the 'small for Duration is extremely large (i.e.
>>= 1.0), D1/D2 should be just slightly less than 1 as a universal_fixed
>value (the result of fixed-fixed division), and when converted to Integer,
>it should be rounded (per RM95 4.6(33)).>>
>
>That's definitely wrong. Using the latest version of GNAT on the program,
>the output is:
>
>Duration divide result:  1
> Int_64 (TS1) =>  495000000
> Int_64 (TS2) =>  500000000
>Time_Span divide result:  0


Hmmm... 3.07 on NT was definitely broken then since it
gave 0.

Kevin