From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f8b2fd444c211b5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: SPAM_Guard_kkrieser@ionet.net (Kevin Krieser)
Subject: Re: Help: pragma inline
Date: 1997/05/21
Message-ID: <5ltenh$dul@ionews.ionet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 242696284
References: <3381bff2.quantum@quantum.pc.my>
Organization: N/A
Reply-To: spam_guard_kkrieser@ionet.net
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


 In message <3381bff2.quantum@quantum.pc.my> - "Adrian B.Y. Hoe"
<byHoe@QUANTUM.PC.MY> writes:
 :>
:>        function Has_Trail (T : Trail) return Boolean
:>        begin
:>           return T.Start_In;
:>        end Trail_Is_In;
:>
:>        pragma Inline(Has_Trail);     -- Line 193
:>
:>        ...
:>
:>
:>OA gives a warning message on line 193: Pragma Inline may not occur
:>after the subprogram body, ignoring pragma inline on this subp.
:>
:>Could anyone explain more about inline and whether the warning could
:>affect the intention of pragma Inline?
:>
:

Is this routine possibly declared in a package spec?

If so, that is where you want to put the Pragma inline.

Otherwise, you might put a function spec earlier in the code, and put the
pragma inline there.

--Because of a large amount of SPAM e-mail, especially following
--postings on the Newsgroups, I have unfortunately had to 
--change my e-mail address in the message headers.  Sorry.