From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/05/15 Message-ID: <5le6vf$15p@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241627718 References: Organization: Prism Systems Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jon S Anthony wrote: >> Well then let's not bother teaching computer science at all! Why not just > >Sounds like a good idea to me. Yeah, why don't we just burn those computer science texts, too! We can start with that _Introduction to Algorithms_, by Cormen, Leiserson and Rivest and thrown in some Knuth and Sedgewick for good measure. >This would be the start of something that made sense if the core >subject was _engineering software artifacts_. This anti-intellectual claptrap romanticizing is getting rather tiresome. Heck, I propose that we do away with learning all together. We should instead hold retreats in the woods to get in touch with those engineers inside of us that are just yearning to be set free! Only then will we develop better software, in the most natural way.