From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ec90d7920bdc8e8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and licensing
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:20:27 +0200
Message-ID: <5l85seF6pc78U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1190014387.975202.55530@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
 <1190032323.899346.97800@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 <1190032933.256219.113550@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net sZsTaGqyJVksfst147Rg0QF/lf4J3MLDfZcT90IRntKT1j31c=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QVbIqm2viNveO4yZ1V5Kw5dofjA=
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1997
Date: 2007-09-17T22:20:27+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Tomek Wa kuski wrote:

> Yes, but if we mean propertiary as "closed source", we can't use
> AdaCore GPL compiler and GtkAda bindings.

You can, as long as you don't distribute. GPL builds on copyright law, and
without distribution ("conveying I think is v3 term?"), it doesn't apply.

> 
> It was only theoretical question, because I'm not interested in
> developing such software.
> 
> Tomek