From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/05/01 Message-ID: <5kb91p$1bc@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 238766386 References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <5k60au$gig@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: Prism Systems Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jon S Anthony wrote: >In article <5k60au$gig@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) writes: > >> What is a computer-science view and how is it incompatible with a software >> engineering view? Do I detect a slight bias against computer science folk? > >IMO, "computer science" is an oxymoron (and this view can and has been >given good arguments of support). Obviously others will and do >disagree. Shrug. It's not so much of an oxymoron as it is a simple misnomer. But we are stuck with it. Some aspects of CS have a scientific flavor; there is a fair degree of empiricism. Whenever you prototype some software, or profile the performance of a program, you are doing an experiment that is not unlike a scientific experiment. You form a hypothesis, construct an apparatus to test it, and then reevaluate and form a new hypothesis... I couldn't help but smile at Fred Brooks' claim that he is a ``dyed in the wool empiricist''.