From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c3a7c1845ec5caf9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: fjh@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: Equality operator overloading in ADA 83 Date: 1997/04/26 Message-ID: <5jsfdm$e50@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 237471778 References: <01bc4e9b$ac0e7fa0$72041dc2@lightning> <335E0B1F.12C9@elca-matrix.ch> <335F5971.6375@elca-matrix.ch> Organization: Comp Sci, University of Melbourne Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: >Actually it is not entirely semantially neutral, there is a problem with >exceptions, in that in the shared model there is only one, and in the >unshared case there are multiple exceptions -- the current Ada 95 solution >in this area is not very appetizing, and also causes portability difficulties. What do you mean when you say there are multiple exceptions in the unshared case? Could someone please elaborate, and/or give a pointer to the appropriate part of the RM? -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.